ELF flow for DF_bandwidth, AIE_reconfig_overhead, tct_1col, and tct_4col #8782
+446
−148
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem solved by the commit
Added ELF flow for DF_bandwidth, AIE_reconfig_overhead, tct_1col, and tct_4col tests, and a hidden sub-cmd --elf for xrt-smi validate.
How problem was solved, alternative solutions (if any) and why they were rejected
Added a variable and functions in XBUtilitiesCore to check if --elf option is used.
DF_bandwidth, AIE_reconfig_overhead, tct_1col, and tct_4col tests would check this variable to decide whether to use ELF flow.
Enabled querying for the new xclbin and elf files for ELF flow.
What has been tested and how, request additional testing if necessary
Tested all available benchmarks on strix b0 with and without --elf.
Ran each test with and without --elf 10 times and compared their average performances. No obvious performance drop shown.